If you are interested in joining future Face Off debates, fill out this form to submit your application.
For: Angela Guo, 16, Phillips Academy (US)
Many classrooms in Hong Kong utilise digital devices for daily learning. However, exams are often still conducted on paper. Standardising all school exams as computer-based would make assessments faster, fairer and more relevant to the skills students will need in the future.
Digital exams capture responses in real time and address several common issues with paper exams, such as missing pages, illegible handwriting and slow or inconsistent grading. Objective questions can be graded automatically, providing teachers with quick access to results and allowing them to focus on giving meaningful feedback.
Digital platforms can generate statistics for individual questions, highlighting which problems students struggled with and which they mastered, enabling teachers to adjust their lessons to address any gaps in understanding.
Editing on a computer is also easier, resulting in more precise, polished work.
Computer-based exams improve inclusion for students with special educational needs. According to the Education Bureau of Hong Kong, computers offer accessibility features that are challenging to replicate on paper. These include screen readers, adjustable text size and spacing, zoom functions and speech-to-text capabilities when appropriate.
While some argue that unequal access to devices among socioeconomic groups renders digitised testing impractical, this challenge actually encourages schools to address the digital divide. Implementing computer-only testing would make device access essential, motivating schools to establish loan systems.
Funds currently spent on printing paper exams could be redirected to provide devices to students in need, ensuring that digital competency becomes a universal skill.
The modern workplace is increasingly reliant on computers, making digital literacy essential across all subjects. This skill better prepares students for future academic and professional challenges. While some studies indicate that handwriting can enhance memory retention – especially during learning and note-taking – in a timed exam, the main goal is to demonstrate understanding and reasoning rather than merely encoding information for later recall.
Against: Leah Lei Lok-ching, 16, Cognitio College (Kowloon)
The rapid adoption of computer-based testing is viewed as a natural advancement in education, reflecting the digital transformation of workplaces.
However, there is evidence suggesting that transitioning all examinations to computers is premature and could negatively impact students’ performance, equitable access and the long-term credibility of education.
Research conducted during the roll-out of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers in the US state of Massachusetts, between 2015 and 2016, provided strong evidence regarding the impact of the online testing format.
Students who took online exams scored consistently lower than those who took paper exams, with scores around 0.10 standard deviations lower in mathematics and 0.25 standard deviations lower in English Language Arts (ELA).
This decrease in scores corresponded to significant amounts of lost learning – up to 5.3 months in maths and 11 months in ELA over a nine-month school year.
The data from Massachusetts revealed significant penalties for online testing, even for primary school students taking the exam for the first time in both 2015 and 2016. This indicated that these disadvantages were not just temporary but inherent to digital delivery methods. In contrast, paper-based formats offer a consistent level of accessibility, free from technology-related issues.
Supporters of computer-based testing highlight its advantages, like quicker grading, fewer cheating opportunities and the potential for innovative question types.
However, these benefits do not outweigh the significant drawbacks. Faster score turnaround is irrelevant if students’ performances do not accurately reflect their actual knowledge.
Moreover, while innovative questions could enhance the testing experience, many online assessments are not computer-adaptive and closely resemble their paper counterparts. In reality, computer-based testing has not led to true innovation; instead, it has resulted in lower performance and increased inequality.
Exams should assess learning outcomes rather than typing skills, scrolling abilities or comfort with technology. The push for universal computer testing confuses technological advancement with genuine educational progress.
